Comments on: the birth of a faster monkey http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/ noise from signal Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:05:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: sinema izle http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140650 sinema izle Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:32:41 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140650 <p>Since JS is interpreted, and you are getting this speedup, how likely do you think that applying it to other dynamic languages would generate similar results (specifically PHP)? I know python has most of the speed critical sections in native code already, but perhaps for the still interpreted pieces it would be helpful too.</p> Since JS is interpreted, and you are getting this speedup, how likely do you think that applying it to other dynamic languages would generate similar results (specifically PHP)? I know python has most of the speed critical sections in native code already, but perhaps for the still interpreted pieces it would be helpful too.

]]> By: Nikoloff http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140526 Nikoloff Sat, 30 May 2009 16:25:40 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140526 <p>Impressive results! The gcc benchmark kicks ass :) I'll be looking forward for future updates.</p> Impressive results! The gcc benchmark kicks ass :) I’ll be looking forward for future updates.

]]> By: bedava video http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140399 bedava video Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:21:14 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140399 <p>Will 3.1 allow Firefox to “play more nicely” with Acrobat?</p> Will 3.1 allow Firefox to “play more nicely” with Acrobat?

]]> By: hagiwhat http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140377 hagiwhat Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:25:01 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140377 <p>Great! Is there any comparison with Webkit?</p> Great! Is there any comparison with Webkit?

]]> By: sarki sozleri http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140369 sarki sozleri Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:29:44 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140369 <p>I, for one, welcome our new tracing overlords...</p> I, for one, welcome our new tracing overlords…

]]> By: pornoizle http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140368 pornoizle Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:29:33 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140368 <p>Awesome, i look forward to the TraceMonkey vs. SquirrelFish wars! Competition is good!</p> Awesome, i look forward to the TraceMonkey vs. SquirrelFish wars! Competition is good!

]]> By: justchuck69 http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-140317 justchuck69 Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:40:54 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-140317 <p>Birotom</p> <p>Dear xlinux, read JohnResig’s blog, but here is the answer ‘If you want to try these out for yourself, just snag a nightly of Firefox 3.1, open about:config, and set the following preference to true: javascript.options.jit.content’</p> <p>i just downloaded the beta yesterday and mine was set to true and it was faster than firefox 3.0.3</p> Birotom

Dear xlinux, read JohnResig’s blog, but here is the answer ‘If you want to try these out for yourself, just snag a nightly of Firefox 3.1, open about:config, and set the following preference to true: javascript.options.jit.content’

i just downloaded the beta yesterday and mine was set to true and it was faster than firefox 3.0.3

]]> By: Birotom http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-139772 Birotom Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:45:14 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-139772 <p>By the way, I compared Firefox 3.1 and IE8 beta in compatibility on our CMS system. IE8 did really awful. Minefield did great, with and without the JIT compiler. We did not really feel the difference, but at least it worked, and that is important.</p> By the way, I compared Firefox 3.1 and IE8 beta in compatibility on our CMS system. IE8 did really awful. Minefield did great, with and without the JIT compiler. We did not really feel the difference, but at least it worked, and that is important.

]]> By: Birotom http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-139771 Birotom Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:43:04 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-139771 <p>Dear xlinux, read JohnResig's blog, but here is the answer 'If you want to try these out for yourself, just snag a nightly of Firefox 3.1, open about:config, and set the following preference to true: javascript.options.jit.content'</p> Dear xlinux, read JohnResig’s blog, but here is the answer ‘If you want to try these out for yourself, just snag a nightly of Firefox 3.1, open about:config, and set the following preference to true: javascript.options.jit.content’

]]> By: tim http://shaver.off.net/diary/2008/08/22/the-birth-of-a-faster-monkey/comment-page-1/#comment-139710 tim Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:27:22 +0000 http://shaver.off.net/diary/?p=3900#comment-139710 <p>My mind is blowing.</p> My mind is blowing.

]]>